Skip to main content
✦ Join Us Every Sunday Morning - Worship at 11:00 AM Tuesday Bible Study - 6:00 PM 114 Bedford Street, Bluefield, WV 24701 Call Us: (304) 327-5249 Call Pastor's Mobile Anytime: 304-920-2631 ✦ Join Us Every Sunday Morning - Worship at 11:00 AM Tuesday Bible Study - 6:00 PM 114 Bedford Street, Bluefield, WV 24701 Call Us: (304) 327-5249 Call Pastor's Mobile Anytime: 304-920-2631

Topic 6 of 33 - Your Place in the Learning Journey

Topic 6 - Foundations

Continuity and Discontinuity

The relationship between the two Testaments is not simply one of promise and fulfillment, though that framework captures something real. It is also a relationship of continuity and discontinuity - of genuine connections across a significant divide. Understanding both dimensions honestly produces a more accurate reading than collapsing the two Testaments into one seamless story or treating them as two entirely separate documents.

The continuity is substantial. The New Testament assumes the Old at virtually every point. Jesus is presented as a Jew who reads, debates, and fulfills the Jewish scriptures. Paul's theological arguments are built on the foundation of the Abrahamic covenant, the law, and the prophets. The categories that organize New Testament thinking - covenant, sacrifice, priesthood, kingdom, redemption - all come from the Old Testament. A reader who does not know the Old Testament will consistently miss what the New Testament is saying and why it matters.

But the discontinuity is also real and should not be minimized. The New Testament makes claims that represent genuine departures from the Old Testament framework. The claim that a crucified man is the Messiah was not simply the fulfillment of clear Old Testament predictions - it was a shocking and controversial claim that most of Jesus's contemporaries rejected precisely because it did not match their reading of the scriptures. The inclusion of Gentiles on equal footing with Jews, without circumcision or full Torah observance, was not an obvious development from the Old Testament - it was a radical extension that required significant theological work to justify, as Paul's letters show.

The most careful readers of both Testaments hold the continuity and discontinuity together without forcing either into the service of a predetermined conclusion. The Old Testament is not simply a foyer to the New. It is a rich and complex body of literature with its own integrity, its own unanswered questions, and its own claims on the reader. And the New Testament is not simply a decoded version of the Old. It is a new thing - related to what came before, growing from it, but not simply contained within it.